Scenario 3: Planning for now and later with the same money
Daniela is 34. She’s expecting her first child in seven months. She and her partner have been building savings, and they’re facing two different needs with different timelines.
The immediate need is clear. Parental leave benefits won’t cover all their expenses. They need about $8,000 in seven months to top up Daniela’s income during the first year. This money needs to be there, guaranteed. Market performance over the next seven months doesn’t matter.
But they’re also thinking longer term. Daniela’s parents didn’t have much financial flexibility when she was growing up. She wants to build something different for her family. She doesn’t have a specific retirement date planned but wants enough of a foundation that her choices aren’t always driven by immediate financial pressure. That goal is 20+ years away.
Daniela can split her savings between both approaches. She can put the $8,000 she needs for parental leave in a short-term fixed-rate GIC that matures when the baby arrives. That money will be available exactly when she needs it. The rest can go into mutual funds with growth potential, where she has years for the investments to ride out market ups and downs.
The trade-off for the GIC portion: That $8,000 won’t benefit from potential market growth over the next seven months. But she accepts that in exchange for certainty.
The trade-off or the mutual funds portion: The longer-term money faces market risk and could go down in value. But over 20+ years, she has time to recover from downturns and potentially see stronger growth.
Using both products may make sense if: You have multiple goals with different timelines. By matching each goal to the right product, you can have short-term certainty for immediate needs and long-term growth potential for future goals. This gives you both security and flexibility.